Hi Friends, Hope you are doing well.

Welcome back. As we close the books on Q1 2026, the narrative is clear:

Consolidation — of capital, of attack surfaces, and of accountability.

The lines between IT, OT, and AI‑enabled risk are vanishing, and the market is responding with a fresh wave of M&A, hardened regulation, and a redefined CISO role that now sits at the board’s table.

Quarter the Industry Grew Up: AI, Money & Industrialization of Cyber Threat

If the cybersecurity industry spent most of the 2020s warning about the threats of tomorrow, the first three months of 2026 delivered a sobering message:

Tomorrow is here.

What follows is not merely a summary of data points — it is a record of an industry being reshaped in real time by generative AI, geopolitical tension, regulatory urgency, and unprecedented capital deployment.

From the first documented use of a commercial AI model to autonomously map operational technology infrastructure inside a Mexican water utility, to ransomware syndicates claiming 2,122 victims in a single quarter, to a record $3.8 billion in cybersecurity financing, to Salt Typhoon campaign breaching U.S. Congressional committee email systems and all four of Singapore's major telecoms — Q1 2026 signals a structural inflection point that every security executive must understand.

This edition covers key IT, OT, AI Cybersecurity insights from Q1 2026 related to:

Hop on to the section that interest you more.

Why read this?

Lots have happened in Q1 2026. Consider this as condensed summary of some key events across the security industry.

If you're seeking insights on any of the above topics, I hope you'll find some valuable information that can shorten your search quest.

In case you missed previous quarterly updates for 2025 you can find them here:

→ Q4 2025 | Q3 2025 | Q2 2025 | Q1 2025.

But before we begin, do me a favour and make sure you “Subscribe” to let me know that you care and keep me motivated to publish more. Thanks!

Ready? let’s dig in.

Yours truly.

— Yousuf.

♻️if you know someone in your professional circle who will benefit from these resources and interested in learning. Thanks 🌟

Together with (Sponsor):

Leadership is asking: are we getting value from AI? Which tools are worth the spend? Where are we exposed? Right now, most teams have no idea.

Harmonic Security Usage Explorer changes that.

You get a complete picture of how your organization uses AI, automatically categorized into custom tasks and use cases.

You’ll see the projects being worked on, who’s using what tools, where AI investments are driving value, and where employees are engaging in risky behavior.

CIOs can rationalize spending and cut wasted licenses. CISOs can pinpoint where risk exists and neutralize it. AI committees can show exactly how their efforts are paying off.

See it in action

According to pinpoint research group Q1 2026 Cybersecurity Vendor Transaction Report; a total of 159 cybersecurity fundings, mergers & acquisitions (M&A) transactions were recorded, including 31 mergers & acquisitions (M&A) events. A total of $4.6 Billion raised over 128 funding rounds tracked.

Cybersecurity investments/fundings surged by 108% in Q1 2026 compared to Q1 2025 — a strong sign of market confidence and acceleration in innovation.

Early stage funding (Seed, Series-A) represents 59% of all Q1, 2026 funding rounds recorded. 128 funding rounds were tracked in Q1 2026 compared to 86 in Q1, 2025.

Ten rounds of funding >$100M were recorded in Q1, 2026 accounting for 42% of all funding in the period.

Below are some interesting cybersecurity market insights from other sources:

Summary on Cybersecurity Market Review Q1 2026 by Altitude Cyber.

A snapshot of Q1 2026 report by Momentum Cyber.

Also, European data from Axeleo Capital’s Q1 2026 Cybersecurity Index (a quarterly analysis of the European cybersecurity ecosystem, tracking investment dynamics, market structure, and emerging trends across the continent.) shows a similar pattern: European cybersecurity sector raised €330M across 38 deals in Q1 2026, compared to €195M across 32 deals in Q1 2025, marking a strong increase in total capital deployed year-over-year.

The cybersecurity capital markets entered 2026 with momentum from a record-breaking 2025 — and Q1 2026 not only sustained that pace but raised it.

According to Momentum Cyber's Q1 2026 Cybersecurity Market Review, the sector registered 108 M&A transactions, the second-highest quarterly deal count across 65 tracked quarters, trailing only Q2 2025's record of 110 deals. Combined M&A and financing activity reached $6.3 billion for the quarter.

Financing volume — at $3.8 billion across 211 rounds — actually outpaced M&A value for only the fourth time since 2018, underscoring how deeply investor conviction in cybersecurity has entrenched itself.

Financing surged 33% year-over-year, while total M&A disclosed value came in at $2.6 billion with six deals exceeding $100 million — the highest concentration of large transactions since the 2021–2022 peak. Strategic corporate buyers dominated capital deployment, accounting for 87% of total M&A value, marking a decisive shift from private equity dominance toward platform companies acquiring specific capabilities.

"Adding AI to the mix is going to be like throwing gasoline on a bonfire." — Eric Parizo, President & Chief Analyst, Cernivera Research (Dark Reading, May 2026).

Strategic corporate buyers dominated the deployment of capital, accounting for 87% of total M&A value. The quarter's headline transactions established the architectural priorities of the sector's largest players:

The quarter produced 38 M&A deals in March 2026 alone, with notable activity involving Airbus, Cellebrite, Databricks, and Rapid7. Median transaction values jumped to over $300 million, making megadeals increasingly the norm. AI Security moved into the spotlight with 12 M&A deals — more than the segment recorded across all of 2025.

One of the most strategically significant trends of Q1 2026 was the acceleration of M&A and investment activity in OT security. Analysts at Infosecurity Magazine had flagged OT security as a 'high priority area for M&A in 2026' — and early data confirmed the prediction.

ServiceNow's $7.75 billion Armis acquisition, covering OT, IoT, and unmanaged device risk management, moved into operational reality in Q1.

Nozomi Networks expanded its platform distribution by making it available on Google Cloud Marketplace, reflecting the convergence of OT security with hyperscaler ecosystems.

The emerging sub-category of ''OT cyber insurance underwriting' — exemplified by DeNexus's debut of its DeRISK UWA Agentic AI platform for industrial cyber insurance and OT risk quantification — signals the next wave of industrial security investment.

Claroty and Carahsoft announced expanded federal sales partnerships to accelerate CPS (cyber-physical systems) protection across federal, state, and local agencies.

Why OT Security Investment Is Accelerating
The Dragos 2026 OT Cybersecurity Year in Review confirmed more adversaries are targeting OT environments, ransomware continues driving operational disruptions across critical sectors, and vulnerabilities are being exploited more rapidly.

Claroty's 2026 research highlights that 12% of OT devices are expected to carry known exploitable vulnerabilities (KEVs), with 7% directly linked to active ransomware campaigns.

That threat profile is pulling capital toward OT-native security platforms at a historic rate. CONTEXT analysts additionally noted that 'AI, OT and identity will all remain popular areas for M&A activity in 2026.'

Q1 2026 marked a decisive separation between AI-native cybersecurity companies and their legacy counterparts.

AI Security captured 46% of all Q1 financing dollars — the clearest signal yet of where investor conviction is concentrating.

Risk and Compliance led all sectors with 49 financing deals, followed by AI Security with 37. The quarter minted at least four new cybersecurity unicorns: Tenex.AI (AI-enabled MDR, raising $250 million in Series B), Aikido, Torq, and XBOW.

The largest funding recipient was Cloaked, a consumer-focused privacy start-up, closing $375 million in Series B financing. Upwind Security (cloud security) also raised $250 million in Series B. Ten rounds exceeded $100 million, totalling $1.8 billion in 'bigger bets.'

Yet abundance has a darker underside. The surge of money into AI-native companies has widened that perilous phase when a start-up has spent its initial funding but not yet achieved revenue sustainability.

Non-AI companies struggling to adapt are finding financing increasingly scarce.

IPO activity was quiet, with no major cybersecurity offerings in Q1, reinforcing M&A as the primary exit pathway. Around 75 companies now carry $1 billion-plus valuations — a 40% increase from two years prior.

Ransomware in Q1 2026 signals a plateau in volume but a sharp rise in geopolitical and operational impact. The same holds for AI‑driven attacks and OT‑specific campaigns.

NordStellar’s Q1 ransomware analysis reports suggests:

And according to Cyble’s Q1 2026 report:

ZeroFox Q1 2026 report observed at least 2,059 separate ransomware and digital extortion (R&DE) incidents in Q1 2026, a decrease of approximately 1.5% from Q4 2025 — which accounted for a record-breaking 2,091 incidents.

The top five most targeted industries in Q1 2026 remained the same as in Q4 2025.

The Gentlemen was responsible for at least 192 separate attacks in Q1 2026, accounting for roughly 9% of all incidents. This is a significantly higher number of incidents in comparison to previous quarters and makes The Gentlemen the third most active R&DE collective of Q1 2026.

Across major tracking platforms, ransomware victim counts in Q1 2026 were flat year‑on‑year, but the geography is now more concentrated.

Ransomware.live reported 2,318 victims in Q1 2026 vs. 2,251 in Q1 2025;

IT‑targeted ransomware in Q1 2026 continued to focus on enterprise‑software, ERP systems, and cloud‑adjacent workloads.

OT/ICS‑centric incidents in Q1 2026 show a drop in “consequential” physical‑impact attacks, but the targeting of critical sectors remains intense.

Waterfall Security / ICS‑STRIVE 2026 OT Cyber Threat Report found that 57 OT‑related attacks caused real‑world physical damage in 2025, a 25% drop from 2024—but most of these were still ransomware‑driven.

In early 2026, Romanian critical‑infrastructure operators suffered multiple ransomware incidents, including attacks on Oltenia Energy Complex (ERP and IT systems) and Apele Române (about 1,000 systems compromised), underscoring the continued risk to energy and utilities even where core OT may remain isolated.

Transport‑sector disruption also made headlines, with claims of UK‑rail‑network access for ransomware groups, though the exact impact on operational technology remains debated.

AI has become both a defensive accelerator and a new attack surface. In Q1 2026, several trend lines emerged.

CrowdStrike’s data shows that adversaries exploited legitimate GenAI tools at more than 90 organizations by injecting malicious prompts to generate commands for stealing credentials and cryptocurrency.

Adversaries also abused AI‑development platforms to establish persistence and deploy ransomware, and ran malicious AI‑servers impersonating trusted services to intercept sensitive data.

On the data‑breach side, several high‑profile incidents in Q1 2026 involved AI‑augmented data‑aggregation and identity‑platforms.

A massive identity‑verification leak attributed to IDMerit exposed about 1 billion identity‑verification records, focusing attention on centralized digital‑identity platforms as high‑risk targets.

Here are some of the updates on regulations and standards in the cybersecurity field from Q1 2026.

Regulatory gravity in 2026 is pulling all three domains—IT, OT/ICS, and AI—toward shorter incident‑reporting windows, supply‑chain‑security mandates, and “secure‑by‑design” product‑level obligations.

The NIS2 Directive continued to drive enforcement and supervisory activity in Q1 2026, with regulators increasingly focusing on essential and important entities (energy, transport, health, water, digital infrastructure).

Emphasis is on supply‑chain security, management accountability, and incident‑handling and reporting within tight timeframes.

Q1 2026 saw unusual density in NIST publications, signalling accelerating federal cybersecurity modernization:

NIST Cyber AI Profile's public comment workshops confirm that AI risk integration into the foundational framework is no longer theoretical — it is becoming operationally required for federal agencies and their contractor ecosystem.

White House's updated cybersecurity executive order reinforced continuity while advancing several provisions with significant operational implications:

CISA's CI Fortify initiative is preparing critical infrastructure operators for cyber scenarios involving disrupted communications and OT compromise.

2026 is the year when AI‑regulation finally becomes operational and enforceable, not just a policy paper. The intersection of AI‑risk, privacy, and cybersecurity is now a board‑level compliance topic.

If there was one cybersecurity announcement in Q1 2026 that made CISOs, software vendors, regulators, and threat researchers stop and pay attention, it was not a ransomware attack, a nation-state campaign, or a major breach.

It was the unveiling of Claude Mythos Preview by Anthropic.

Unlike traditional AI announcements focused on productivity or coding assistance, Mythos was presented as a cybersecurity-focused frontier model capable of autonomously discovering software vulnerabilities, identifying exploit chains, and uncovering previously unknown security weaknesses at unprecedented scale.

Anthropic considered the capability sufficiently powerful that it chose not to publicly release the model and instead launched a controlled-access initiative called Project Glasswing.

More than 10,000 high- and critical-severity vulnerabilities were reportedly identified during the first phase of Project Glasswing testing.

Agentic AI Security Guidance: The Multi-Nation Publication Every OT Practitioner Must Read: In one of the most consequential security guidance publications of Q1 2026, CISA — alongside Australia's ASD, NSA, Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, New Zealand NCSC, and UK NCSC — released 'Careful Adoption of Agentic AI Services.'

The guidance addresses cybersecurity challenges specific to agentic AI systems that can autonomously reason, plan, take actions, and even spawn sub-agents without continuous human intervention.

These systems introduce: expanded attack surfaces, privilege escalation when agents are granted broad access permissions, behavioural misalignment when agents pursue goals in unintended ways, and limited auditability complicating post-incident forensics.

Agentic AI and OT/ICS: The Intersection of Two Risk Worlds
The CISA guidance takes on particular gravity for OT practitioners.

As agentic AI systems are piloted for predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and automated response in industrial environments, the OT attack surface expands in ways traditional perimeter controls cannot address.

The guidance explicitly notes that 'information continuously flows between AI and non-AI systems, increasingly blurring defensive boundaries and making it difficult to isolate AI-related risks from broader cyber threats' — a statement that maps directly onto the IT/OT convergence challenge defining industrial cybersecurity for a decade.

CISA and G7 partners' SBOM for AI guidance further extends the obligation: AI components embedded in OT systems will require the same supply chain documentation and provenance tracking as conventional IT software.

NIST's Cyber AI Profile — a community profile under CSF 2.0 — completed its January 2026 comment period and workshop cycle. The profile integrates AI risk management with existing cybersecurity frameworks, addressing a critical gap.

World Economic Forum's Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 found that 64% of organizations are now accounting for geopolitically motivated cyberattacks such as disruption of critical infrastructure or espionage. Notably, 91% of the largest organizations have changed their cybersecurity strategies due to geopolitical volatility. The WEF's AI-driven cybersecurity roadmap issued in Q1 called for structured deployment frameworks, continuous monitoring, and mandatory human control provisions in high-stakes AI applications including critical infrastructure.

Google's Threat Intelligence Group issued a warning that adversaries are increasingly using generative AI tools across multiple stages of the cyberattack lifecycle — from reconnaissance and vulnerability research to payload development and post-compromise activity. Combined with the Dragos Monterrey findings, this confirms adversarial use of AI tools has progressed from theoretical concern to documented operational reality.

Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) entered full enforcement of its AI and Automated Processing Regulation in Q1 2026, extending data protection obligations to AI-driven decision-making processes and establishing one of the most specific AI-governance enforcement frameworks of any Middle Eastern jurisdiction.

For financial services firms operating across the Gulf, this creates a layered compliance obligation that increasingly mirrors the EU's AI Act risk-based approach — but with Gulf-specific sovereignty and localization requirements.

Saudi Arabia's SDAIA has similarly signalled intent to move into AI governance enforcement, having already positioned as an active regulator on personal data protection.

Across APAC, Vietnam's Law on Data, Singapore's expanded Cybersecurity Act, and Malaysia's legislative developments each touch AI governance, data handling, and cybersecurity in overlapping ways — creating a regional regulatory mosaic that multinationals must navigate carefully.

For more comprehensive coverage checkout the following Global AI Regulations Roundups from Securiti:

Together with (Sponsor):

Viktor reads overnight tickets, tags them by product area, summarizes the patterns, and posts a brief in #support. The agent picks up the queue already triaged. The PM sees recurring requests rolled up by Friday.

Get Started for Free

Enterprise IT · OT/ICS · AI Governance — From Gatekeepers to Governors

The Data Behind the Transformation - By Numbers — SPLUNK 2026 CISO REPORT (650 GLOBAL CISOS, FEB 24, 2026)

CISOs find themselves at a genuine inflection point in Q1 2026. Splunk's annual CISO Report — surveying 650 global CISOs — found that nearly four out of five report their role has become significantly more complex.

Responsibility for AI governance and risk management now falls to effectively all respondents surveyed.

Oversight of generative and other AI systems has joined established duties in detection, response, compliance, and reporting — without commensurate reduction in the original mandate.

The Retail & Hospitality ISAC's 2026 CISO Benchmark Report (200+ industry CISOs) found 70% had AI formally added to their scope of responsibility.

PwC's 2026 Global Digital Trust Insights survey reinforces the pattern: the role is evolving from technical leadership to enterprise risk architecture — translating cyber risk into financial and operational language that boards, CFOs, and general counsel can act on.

Gartner estimates that 85% of CEOs now consider cybersecurity essential to business development — a statistic that elevates the CISO's standing while raising the stakes of every decision.

"CISOs operate in the eye of the storm, at the center of constant transformation. We are not just managing technology. We are managing risk, talent, and the digital resilience that drives critical business outcomes." — Michael Fanning, CISO, Splunk (Cisco Newsroom, February 24, 2026).

The 'unicorn CISO' era — the single executive expected to simultaneously master technical depth, board communication, regulatory compliance, and AI governance — is effectively over.

Modern CISO Is Becoming a “Business Resilience Executive”.

The traditional CISO role focused on: technical controls, compliance, and incident response.

The Q1 2026 CISO role increasingly encompasses: enterprise resilience, AI governance, geopolitical risk, operational continuity, and board-level business strategy.

Forward-thinking organizations are bifurcating the role: a strategic CISO focused on enterprise risk and governance, and a VP of Security Engineering focused on technical execution.

CISOs are increasingly reporting directly to the CEO or board, with clearer decision rights and budget authority than in previous cycles.

Force Multiplier & Expanding Threat Surface — Simultaneously

CISO community's relationship with AI in Q1 2026 is defined by cautious, evidence based optimism on the defensive side, and clear-eyed alarm on the offensive side.

Over 90% of organizations do not allow blanket access to AI applications: 56% block most AI tools while maintaining defined allow lists, while another quarter allows most tools but blocks specific high-risk applications such as DeepSeek.

These policies reflect reality that employees will find ways to use AI regardless of policy — question is whether the organization manages that use or merely reacts to it.

CISOs Now Own AI Risk Governance.

Organizations increasingly expect CISOs to oversee: AI security policy, AI adoption governance, model risk management, AI supply chain risk, and AI usage controls.

This requires CISOs to collaborate deeply with: legal, data science, compliance, and executive leadership teams.

The AI mission belongs to the CISO not because it was assigned, but because no other
executive possesses the combination of technical depth, risk management expertise, and cross-functional perspective required to guide organizations through AI's transformative — and dangerous — potential.

Board Expectations Have Changed

Boards increasingly expect CISOs to communicate: operational resilience, financial exposure, AI risk, supply-chain dependencies, and business continuity impacts.

The modern CISO must translate: cyber risk → business language.

Metrics now increasingly emphasize: exposure reduction, resilience maturity, recovery readiness, and operational uptime instead of merely counting alerts or vulnerabilities.

For CISOs and OT security leaders operating in industrial environments, the mandate expansion is even more acute.

CISOs Are Being Pulled Into OT/ICS Governance

As OT incidents gain executive visibility, CISOs increasingly participate in: industrial modernization, smart factory transformation, and cyber-physical resilience planning.

This is forcing many CISOs to learn: industrial operations, safety engineering, OT network architectures, and operational risk management.

The “IT-only security leader” model is fading rapidly.

The Dragos 2026 OT Cybersecurity Year in Review confirms adversaries are progressing through the ICS Cyber Kill Chain at different speeds — some focused on initial access, others already at Stage 2, conducting reconnaissance and testing inside OT environments to understand control loops and position for future manipulation of industrial processes.

Armis CTO Carlos Buenano articulated the organizing principle for serious OT security programs in 2026: CTEM (Continuous Threat Exposure Management). 'A few years ago, CTEM was just another Gartner acronym. In 2026, it's the organizing principle for any serious OT security program.'

It represents a shift from periodic vulnerability management to continuous, risk-based exposure assessment across hardware, firmware, network paths, and supply-chain dependencies.

What the Best OT-Aware CISOs Are Doing Differently in Q1 2026:

Conducting continuous CPS discovery and purpose-aware risk scoring — not annual audits.

Enforcing strict segmentation between enterprise and control zones while validating every remote access pathway. Implementing micro segmentation to prevent lateral movement into OT environments.

Requiring cryptographic passwordless authentication to prevent credential misuse. Building incident response plans that explicitly account for loss of control system integrity — not just loss of data confidentiality.

And establishing behavioural monitoring paired with pre-deployment supply chain assurance to address both symptoms and root causes of OT vulnerabilities.

The stakes — operational disruption, physical harm, environmental damage — are qualitatively different from those facing IT security leaders.

The CISO who understands that distinction is the one who survives a board debrief after an OT incident.

78% of CISOs Fear Personal Legal Exposure — Reshaping How Decisions Are Made
Personal liability is becoming a routine part of the CISO job description.

In Splunk's 2026 CISO Report, 78% of CISOs said they are concerned about their own liability for security incidents — up sharply from 56% the prior year.

The SolarWinds-era lesson that CISOs can face personal legal exposure is no longer a distant cautionary tale; it is a daily operating reality that influences everything from risk acceptance frameworks to how security incidents are communicated upward.

Security leaders are investing heavily in documentation, board communication protocols, and defensible decision records.

The WEF Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 reinforced this dimension, noting that 31% of survey respondents reported low confidence in their nation's ability to respond to major cyber incidents — up from 26% the prior year — placing additional pressure on enterprise-level security leaders to compensate for perceived national preparedness gaps.

Security leaders continue facing: burnout, staffing shortages, escalating complexity, and alert overload.

At the same time, AI is reshaping workforce expectations.

Organizations increasingly seek professionals skilled in: AI security, adversarial ML, automation engineering, OT cybersecurity, and exposure management.

The cybersecurity workforce itself is undergoing transformation.

1.AI Security Will Dominate the Next Cybersecurity Era - AI is no longer optional. Every organization must develop: AI governance, AI security controls, and AI operational resilience.

2. OT/ICS Security Is Becoming National Infrastructure Security - Industrial cyber risk is increasingly tied to: national resilience, energy stability, manufacturing continuity, and public safety.

3. Identity Is the New Perimeter - The future security stack is increasingly identity-centric: human identities, machine identities, API identities, and AI agent identities.

4. Platform Consolidation Will Continue - Security buyers want: fewer tools, unified telemetry, integrated workflows, and AI-assisted operations.

5. CISOs Must Become Cross-Functional Strategists - The modern security leader must understand: cyber risk, AI governance, operational resilience, regulatory exposure, and business strategy simultaneously.

By the end of Q1 2026, following meta‑trends were clear.

Q1 2026 demonstrated that cybersecurity is a business resilience function, an AI governance challenge, a national infrastructure priority, and a strategic boardroom issue.

The convergence of IT, AI, OT/ICS, cloud, identity, and geopolitical cyber conflict is redefining the entire security landscape.

Organizations that succeed over the next decade will be those capable of integrating IT and OT security, governing AI responsibly, operationalizing resilience, and adapting at machine speed.

Cybersecurity industry has entered a new phase: “Autonomous Cyber Resilience.”

Stay ahead. Stay secure.

Until next time—keep the lights on (and the attackers out).

Questions or topic requests for Q2 2026? Hit reply.

Here’s a list of sources used and for further reference reading:

Securing Things Academy: (coming soon)

IT & OT CySEAT (Cyber Security Education And Transformation) course is designed for IT and OT cybersecurity practitioners. Join the wait-list → here.

Checkout a brief overview below:

In case you’ve missed - here are some of my recent most viewed social posts.

Whenever you are ready - I can help you with:

A - IT & OT Cybersecurity Advisory / Consulting services - for securing your business and or its digital transformation journey.

B - Security Awareness Training & Phishing Awareness Portal - Train your staff and build a Security awareness program through our subscription based service.

C - Securing Things Academy (STA) - Security trainings for IT & OT practitioners.

Visit the newsletter website for Links to above services and or reach out at info[at]securingthings[dot]com or DM me via LinkedIn.

D - Securing Things Newsletter - Sponsor this newsletter to showcase your brand globally, or subscribe to simply Get Smarter at Securing Things.

Reach out at newsletter[at]securingthings[dot]com or DM me via LinkedIn.